its a pity sets arent spaced out more 2 mutch female flesh 2 cope with 4 one day very sexy girl like her seated pose its as if she dosent realize she has no pants on an we can see all her treasures
gaston on November 21, 2012 9:12 pm
diosa estas hermosaaaaaa sos un bombom
PNF on November 22, 2012 3:39 am
Exceptionally pretty in the face, eyes, and hair. The body is sweet, but nothing to write home about. Better mom didn’t know anyway.
Tony – the Original on November 22, 2012 6:07 am
An interesting shoot. Just think, a girl goes out on a summer’s day, pretty frock, has a sit down, knees up and has forgotten to put her undies on. Happens all the time.
jimbob on November 22, 2012 3:06 pm
PNF
you forgot the great nipples. that face will draw you in and the body will keep you there
KP on November 23, 2012 12:34 am
What a beautiful girl. Those eyes would get me everytime.
Seneca on November 25, 2012 2:52 am
Not bad, her face is as was mentioned “pretty” but not seductive. Her body works on the seducing part.
Tony – the Original on November 25, 2012 3:41 am
Actually I think the young lady is being rather generous in her expression of sexual vitality.
What on earth am I talking about? She’s just a little nymph wanting to flash her gash for cash!
Seneca on November 25, 2012 3:59 pm
With that last sentence Tony you described nearly all nude models. Although there are some exceptions I should point out.
Tony – the Original on November 25, 2012 8:07 pm
Interesting point you make Seneca. Please expand.
Neverthelss I almost certainly think that the girls that appear on this type of site, with their genitalia often the focus or significant by product of the exposition then the photoset is not expected to be judged as a pure art form. It is erotica designed to stimulate the observer, so lets have it in spades!!
PERSIAN on November 26, 2012 5:50 am
A perfect woman with perfect tight pussy
Thawallah on November 26, 2012 11:49 am
Tony, at the risk of sounding dysfunctional – yes photography at its best is an artform…but some women are who they are, she is pretty – a nice pair of shoes too – I would love to see her calfs working ( walking) in these.
Tony – the Original on November 26, 2012 1:12 pm
Thawallah, just about everyone visiting this site is dysfunctional – even me! Just read the archives and then try to disagree with me!
Seneca on November 27, 2012 12:15 am
Well to expand upon my point Tony, the exception I’ve found is in a couple of the models at BodyinMind specifically Cat. Nevertheless, we can never truly know (unless we have nude models as our friends) if cash is the only incentive on a model’s mind. Nude photography can never be art in my opinion because it stimulates desire in men (Do I have to say men and women? Does being PC matter here?). The only difference between us all is the degree of control one possesses over that desire.
Seneca on November 27, 2012 12:28 am
I dont believe, but I just came across the fact that this girl goes under the name “Toxic A” for Met-Art….
Tony – the Original on November 27, 2012 9:52 am
Seneca, the whole issue of nude photography as art is a topic I can’t be bothered intellectualising on – just too hard. My B & W opinion is as I said – if the genitals of the female in particular are a significant focus of the exposition then it must be in the realm of soft porn. If the focus is explicit, well the issue is abundantly clear cut.
I doubt you are going to get into too much trouble here by being a little astray in the PC fashion stakes.
Tony – the Original on November 27, 2012 9:54 am
I just realised you can’t say pawn in the other sense and spelling here so I reprint w/o the offending word:
Seneca, the whole issue of nude photography as art is a topic I can’t be bothered intellectualising on – just too hard. My B & W opinion is as I said – if the genitals of the female in particular are a significant focus of the exposition then it must be in the realm of soft stuff. If the focus is explicit, well the issue is abundantly clear cut.
I doubt you are going to get into too much trouble here by being a little astray in the PC fashion stakes.
Tony – the Original on November 27, 2012 9:55 am
The heavy hand of the moderator is at it again – automatically looking for ‘offending’ key words.
Linz on November 29, 2012 12:04 am
Stunning model, beautiful hair and delightful smile. Lovely bottom and poses .
Anku857 on November 29, 2012 6:53 am
U r really sexy and beautiful with lovely hair i cannot put my eyes off u
Jerry on November 30, 2012 11:51 am
Hey Tony and Seneca, who cares? She is a pretty woman and looke great.
Tony – the Original on November 30, 2012 11:56 pm
Jerry, I understand your sentiment. Perhaps in too many words what I really wanted to say is that she presents as a chickie I’d like to root!
Clive on December 1, 2012 2:10 pm
While all am thinking about now iz s€¥,true!pretty face yellow dress rocks.c’mon pretty face do your thing!
NickNameOnly on December 15, 2012 4:38 am
I don’t know why she is in the top here? I have seen way hotter girls on this site. Don’t get me wrong, she is sexy, but not that sexy.
Tony – the Original on December 16, 2012 1:26 am
I hear what you say Mr NickNameOnly but you should be able to figure it out. I agree it is not super erotic but it has its charms. A girl with a pretty summer dress on, sits down for a reflective moment carefree to the fact she is sans knickers, well if Anne Hathaway can turn up at a gala event without her undies on, why can’t the anonymous young lass wanting to kickstart her career by flashing her business card to all and sundry? Makes sense to me!!
Seneca on December 22, 2012 5:05 am
As always Tony, your replies possess that aura of flare. My understanding is that people like a ‘real world’ beauty, someone who they think is within their radius of seduction ability. I stand by my first comment under this pic which begins with ‘not bad’ ie I’ve seen plenty better and she’s not exactly my type. Nevertheless the people have ‘chosen’ although I’m very doubtful about that in relation to the second-place set.
Tony – the Original on December 22, 2012 6:13 am
Well Seneca, I agree she has an abnormally high rating compared to what some other more deserving models (IMHO) get rated at. That said though, your suggestion that the ‘real world’ beauty or put simply the girl next door look probably acts in this model’s favour. She has a nice face but it isn’t a classic beautiful face. As well she does have a very casual deportment about her just sitting there with legs apart, no knickers giving anyone walking past a natural and innocent view of her genitalia. Its only when she sheds her dress that she becomes unashamedly a focus of full blown sexuality. The whole set of pix has merit but the rating is subject to debate.
Seneca on December 22, 2012 5:17 pm
Appreciate the quick reply, and that pretty much settles it.
bushmaster on January 5, 2013 11:51 pm
Lovely young girl with nice smile. I would love to lick her all over, especially her small breasts and pussy.
Brockie on January 15, 2013 4:07 am
Tony has succumbed to verbosity again.
Tony – the Original on January 17, 2013 1:59 am
Brockie – I confess – I swallowed a dictionary in the lead up to Xmas.
Brockie on December 10, 2013 10:24 am
Time you coughed it up Tony, you garrulous twit!
glen on May 19, 2014 9:02 pm
angela I’ve seen you many times i would love to see you in person glen
Randy on January 10, 2015 3:38 am
I’ve returned to this photo set over and over. The girl, the setting and lighting, the outfit, and the shot selection are all superb.
Brockie on January 11, 2015 12:23 pm
Well she does have a lovely slot and doesn’t mind showing it.
Charlie on May 11, 2015 10:59 pm
Does anyone know what became of Angela or “Toxic A” as she was called back in the day. I still can’t get over how gorgeous she was (regardless if what the guy above thinks). I wonder if she went back to Russia or the Ukraine or wherever she was from. I wish she was still modeling as she did some terrific work. Met Art has some excellent photographers!
chapuzon on August 22, 2016 6:58 pm
a wellknown set with a beauty and there is some kind of magic with her body.
(246 votes, average: 8.75 out of 10)
Loading...
its a pity sets arent spaced out more 2 mutch female flesh 2 cope with 4 one day very sexy girl like her seated pose its as if she dosent realize she has no pants on an we can see all her treasures
diosa estas hermosaaaaaa sos un bombom
Exceptionally pretty in the face, eyes, and hair. The body is sweet, but nothing to write home about. Better mom didn’t know anyway.
An interesting shoot. Just think, a girl goes out on a summer’s day, pretty frock, has a sit down, knees up and has forgotten to put her undies on. Happens all the time.
PNF
you forgot the great nipples. that face will draw you in and the body will keep you there
What a beautiful girl. Those eyes would get me everytime.
Not bad, her face is as was mentioned “pretty” but not seductive. Her body works on the seducing part.
Actually I think the young lady is being rather generous in her expression of sexual vitality.
What on earth am I talking about? She’s just a little nymph wanting to flash her gash for cash!
With that last sentence Tony you described nearly all nude models. Although there are some exceptions I should point out.
Interesting point you make Seneca. Please expand.
Neverthelss I almost certainly think that the girls that appear on this type of site, with their genitalia often the focus or significant by product of the exposition then the photoset is not expected to be judged as a pure art form. It is erotica designed to stimulate the observer, so lets have it in spades!!
A perfect woman with perfect tight pussy
Tony, at the risk of sounding dysfunctional – yes photography at its best is an artform…but some women are who they are, she is pretty – a nice pair of shoes too – I would love to see her calfs working ( walking) in these.
Thawallah, just about everyone visiting this site is dysfunctional – even me! Just read the archives and then try to disagree with me!
Well to expand upon my point Tony, the exception I’ve found is in a couple of the models at BodyinMind specifically Cat. Nevertheless, we can never truly know (unless we have nude models as our friends) if cash is the only incentive on a model’s mind. Nude photography can never be art in my opinion because it stimulates desire in men (Do I have to say men and women? Does being PC matter here?). The only difference between us all is the degree of control one possesses over that desire.
I dont believe, but I just came across the fact that this girl goes under the name “Toxic A” for Met-Art….
Seneca, the whole issue of nude photography as art is a topic I can’t be bothered intellectualising on – just too hard. My B & W opinion is as I said – if the genitals of the female in particular are a significant focus of the exposition then it must be in the realm of soft porn. If the focus is explicit, well the issue is abundantly clear cut.
I doubt you are going to get into too much trouble here by being a little astray in the PC fashion stakes.
I just realised you can’t say pawn in the other sense and spelling here so I reprint w/o the offending word:
Seneca, the whole issue of nude photography as art is a topic I can’t be bothered intellectualising on – just too hard. My B & W opinion is as I said – if the genitals of the female in particular are a significant focus of the exposition then it must be in the realm of soft stuff. If the focus is explicit, well the issue is abundantly clear cut.
I doubt you are going to get into too much trouble here by being a little astray in the PC fashion stakes.
The heavy hand of the moderator is at it again – automatically looking for ‘offending’ key words.
Stunning model, beautiful hair and delightful smile. Lovely bottom and poses .
U r really sexy and beautiful with lovely hair i cannot put my eyes off u
Hey Tony and Seneca, who cares? She is a pretty woman and looke great.
Jerry, I understand your sentiment. Perhaps in too many words what I really wanted to say is that she presents as a chickie I’d like to root!
While all am thinking about now iz s€¥,true!pretty face yellow dress rocks.c’mon pretty face do your thing!
I don’t know why she is in the top here? I have seen way hotter girls on this site. Don’t get me wrong, she is sexy, but not that sexy.
I hear what you say Mr NickNameOnly but you should be able to figure it out. I agree it is not super erotic but it has its charms. A girl with a pretty summer dress on, sits down for a reflective moment carefree to the fact she is sans knickers, well if Anne Hathaway can turn up at a gala event without her undies on, why can’t the anonymous young lass wanting to kickstart her career by flashing her business card to all and sundry? Makes sense to me!!
As always Tony, your replies possess that aura of flare. My understanding is that people like a ‘real world’ beauty, someone who they think is within their radius of seduction ability. I stand by my first comment under this pic which begins with ‘not bad’ ie I’ve seen plenty better and she’s not exactly my type. Nevertheless the people have ‘chosen’ although I’m very doubtful about that in relation to the second-place set.
Well Seneca, I agree she has an abnormally high rating compared to what some other more deserving models (IMHO) get rated at. That said though, your suggestion that the ‘real world’ beauty or put simply the girl next door look probably acts in this model’s favour. She has a nice face but it isn’t a classic beautiful face. As well she does have a very casual deportment about her just sitting there with legs apart, no knickers giving anyone walking past a natural and innocent view of her genitalia. Its only when she sheds her dress that she becomes unashamedly a focus of full blown sexuality. The whole set of pix has merit but the rating is subject to debate.
Appreciate the quick reply, and that pretty much settles it.
Lovely young girl with nice smile. I would love to lick her all over, especially her small breasts and pussy.
Tony has succumbed to verbosity again.
Brockie – I confess – I swallowed a dictionary in the lead up to Xmas.
Time you coughed it up Tony, you garrulous twit!
angela I’ve seen you many times i would love to see you in person glen
I’ve returned to this photo set over and over. The girl, the setting and lighting, the outfit, and the shot selection are all superb.
Well she does have a lovely slot and doesn’t mind showing it.
Does anyone know what became of Angela or “Toxic A” as she was called back in the day. I still can’t get over how gorgeous she was (regardless if what the guy above thinks). I wonder if she went back to Russia or the Ukraine or wherever she was from. I wish she was still modeling as she did some terrific work. Met Art has some excellent photographers!
a wellknown set with a beauty and there is some kind of magic with her body.
Lovely shots of her privates.
What a wonderful pussy!